CE
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- FY 2024 delivered a sharp turnaround to profitability at the consolidated level (net income attributable to shareholders $11.79M; diluted EPS $0.13), powered by battery-segment margin expansion, but Q4 itself was weak with a consolidated net loss as Hitrans’ raw materials unit weighed on results .
- Battery business gross margin expanded to 31.5% for FY 2024 (+7.7ppt YoY), with net income rising 39% to $19.43M; residential energy and LEV demand were resilient, while EV revenues fell YoY .
- Management accelerated capacity plans: Nanjing Phase II adds ~3 GWh in 2025; Dalian upgrades to launch 40135 cells (~2.3 GWh) by end-2025; total cylindrical-cell capacity expected to reach ~7.6 GWh by end-2025, with overseas production targeted for 2026 to mitigate tariffs .
- Wall Street consensus from S&P Global was unavailable for Q4/FY comparison; investors should focus on margin durability, capacity ramp execution, and tariff/geopolitical navigation as near-term stock catalysts .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Battery segment margins and profits inflected: gross margin 31.5% (+7.7ppt YoY) and net income $19.43M (+39%), with CEO highlighting performance “ahead of many competitors” and strong 32140 demand exceeding supply .
- Consolidated turnaround: FY gross margin improved to 23.7% (+8.2ppt YoY) and net income attributable to shareholders reached $11.79M, reversing FY 2023 loss; CFO emphasized battery segment robustness despite lower consolidated revenues .
- Capacity and product roadmap: commissioning two new 32140 lines (~3 GWh) in Nanjing by late-2025; Dalian upgrade to 40135 adds ~2.3 GWh; management expects substantial revenue growth from 2026 on ramp-up .
What Went Wrong
- Q4 softness: derived consolidated Q4 net revenues ~$25.37M and operating loss ~$6.59M; consolidated net loss attributable to shareholders ~-$4.51M, reflecting Hitrans weakness and seasonal/mix factors .
- Segment mix pressure: EV battery revenues fell 41.7% YoY in FY 2024 to $1.68M, and Q3 energy storage revenue was down 25% YoY amid a planned Dalian maintenance shutdown impacting throughput .
- Geopolitical/tariff headwinds: customers pushing for overseas manufacturing; management cautioned on tariff risk and macro softness at end-applications, with Hitrans industry in downturn and no new investments planned there .
Financial Results
Consolidated Quarterly Trends (Q2 → Q3 → Q4 2024)
Note: Q4 figures are derived from FY minus nine months; EPS for Q4 is not disclosed in filings .
Consolidated Full-Year Comparison
Battery Business Segment (Applications) – FY 2023 vs FY 2024
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Gross profit for our battery segment… US$43.05 million… gross profit margin… 31.5%… net income… $19.43 million… surpass those of many industry competitors… demand for our Model 32140 exceeding supply… actively expanding production capacity” .
- CFO: “Consolidated… turnaround—from a net loss in 2023 to net income attributable… US$11.79 million… decline in consolidated net revenues… primarily due to… Hitrans… gross profit margin of 23.65%… having fully met all financial obligations to Hitrans… its financial performance does not materially impact our business [battery segment]” .
- CEO (Q4 call): commissioning 2 new 32140 lines in Nanjing (~3 GWh) and upgrading Dalian to 40135 (~2.3 GWh) with substantial revenue growth expected starting 2026 .
- CFO (Q4 call): overseas capacity targeted by 2026 to address tariffs; customers willing to place substantial orders with higher prepayments; Hitrans industry downturn and no new investments .
Q&A Highlights
- Equipment terms and implementation: Suppliers offering more favorable payment schedules; equipment already in transit; decision pending on relocation to overseas factory vs new equipment .
- Macro/tariffs: Customers less focused on macro but concerned about tariffs/geopolitics; management being “pushed” to set up overseas factory to avoid tariffs .
- Hitrans strategy: No further investments; segment remains independent and continues to weigh on consolidated results .
- LEV demand geography: Strength in India, Vietnam, Indonesia, with reliance on Chinese cell imports; CBAT positioned with stable products .
- Maintenance/line shutdown cadence: Dalian Q3 suspension for optimization and upgrade to tablet 26650; planned and driven by market trends and energy-cost optimization .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates for Q4 and FY 2024 were unavailable due to data access limitations. As a result, beats/misses vs consensus cannot be assessed in this report; investors should monitor subsequent consensus updates post-publication [GetEstimates error].
- Without consensus, focus on actual margin durability (battery GM 31.5% for FY) and Q4 sequential declines driven by Hitrans and maintenance impacts to gauge likely estimate revisions .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Margin-led battery segment strength is intact; the core business remains profitable with FY battery GM 31.5% and net income $19.43M, suggesting resilience even in industry downturns .
- Q4 consolidated loss underscores exposure to Hitrans/raw materials volatility; near-term stock reactions likely hinge on clarity of Hitrans strategy and segment separation dynamics .
- Execution on capacity ramps (Nanjing Phase II, Dalian 40135) and achieving ~7.6 GWh by end-2025 are critical operational catalysts for 2026 revenue inflection .
- Overseas manufacturing by 2026 to mitigate tariffs could unlock larger, pre-paid orders from key global customers; watch for formal agreements and site selection .
- LEV and portable/home storage demand are structural growth drivers; EV remains a small, currently declining revenue stream—mix shifts favor storage/LEV economics .
- Absent consensus data, traders should track sequential quarterly trends: Q2→Q3→Q4 showed revenue compression and margin normalization; any rebound in Q1/Q2 2025 will be stock-positive .
- Non-GAAP clarity matters: management frequently references “after deducting change in fair value of warrants” for net income; ensure comparisons use consistent bases .